The New York Times • 10/6/2025 – 10/21/2025

An appeals court has ruled that National Guard troops can remain under the control of the Trump administration. However, the court has upheld a previous temporary ruling that prohibits the deployment of these troops into the Chicago area while a legal challenge is ongoing. This decision reflects the ongoing legal disputes surrounding the deployment of National Guard troops in various cities, including Chicago and Portland. In a related matter, three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit are currently reviewing an order that blocks President Trump from deploying National Guard soldiers in Portland. This indicates that there are multiple legal challenges regarding the deployment of National Guard troops in different locations, with courts evaluating the legality of such actions by the Trump administration. Additionally, Oklahoma's Republican Governor Kevin Stitt has expressed his opposition to the deployment of National Guard troops in Chicago, stating that “Oklahomans would lose their mind” if Illinois sent troops to their state. This comment highlights the differing opinions among governors regarding the deployment of National Guard troops and the potential implications for state relations. In New York City, mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani has made a case to President Trump that National Guard troops are not needed in the city, suggesting that local leaders are actively engaging with federal authorities on this issue. This reflects the broader conversation about the necessity and appropriateness of deploying National Guard troops in urban areas amid ongoing tensions and protests.
Advertisement









